Let’s say that the administration would attempt a smear on a critics sexual orientation to defend itself against that critic’s charges. Would that strategy:
A) Be Preposterous
B) Be Beyond Ridiculous-no one would ever do it
C) Have the potential to boomerang
D) Cause everyone to drop their jaws and stare at their stupidity in wonder
E) Be A sign of the apocalypse as recounted in the most recent Left Behind Book
F) Be Business as usual for the current morons who keep lowering the level to which I think they’ll sink
G) All of the above
A, C and D (modified to replace “everyone” with “70% of the people who have a clue as to what’s going on in the world”)
my ? for the open thread-is there a breakdown of the dem primary vote along ethnic lines? i haven’t seen one. did Obama win the white vote?
F, definitely F.
Corvax,
According to Tavis Smiley, Mr. Obama picked up 35% of the white vote in the primary, a primary with the highest turnout in 12 years.
The link will take you to Mr. Smiley’s interview with Mr. Obama
http://www.npr.org/rundowns/rundown.php?prgDate=29-Mar-2004&prgId=14
A, C, D & F.
Bill Frist’s perjury trial balloon shows that there is no depth to which they will not stoop. I just hope that the administration is as out of touch as I suspect they are and that such smear-the-queer tactics will backfire on them. I hope it will cause progressives to give some money to Kerry, MoveOn or to progressive senate candidates like Obama.
In fact, I think I will make a small donation right now.
Business as usual for this corrupt bunch.
Yup, I have to say D and F.