2011

Why Chris Christie Will Never Be President And Probably Be A One-Termer

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XiAxgdAcsU[/youtube]

He might get to be judge–calling Mike Bilandic.

But more to the point, he has the same game for anytime he’s called on his bullshit.

 

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufm8fhLjAlM[/youtube]

 

I’m not big on caring about using state helicopters or planes for a variety of reasons so I don’t care that he took the helicopter so much, but the notion that he gets caught being stupid and he gets to play he loves his family reminds me of one particular asshole here in Illinois.  Add to this his temper and he’d never make it through a campaign for president and may well not make it through a reelection race.

Next You Know Villagers Will Be Shocked by Swearing

Glenn Greenwald has an excellent post about the stupidity and incredible hypocrisy going on over Weiner.

 

What makes the Anthony Weiner story somewhat unique and thus worth discussing for a moment is that, as Hendrik Hertzberg points out, the pretense of substantive relevance (which, lame though it was in prior scandals, was at least maintained) has been more or less brazenly dispensed with here.  This isn’t a case of illegal sex activity or gross hypocrisy (i.e., David Vitter, Larry Craig, Mark Foley (who built their careers on Family Values) or Eliot Spitzer (who viciously prosecuted trivial prostitution cases)).  There’s no lying under oath (Clinton) or allegedly illegal payments (Ensign, Edwards).  From what is known, none of the women claim harassment and Weiner didn’t even have actual sex with any of them.  This is just pure mucking around in the private, consensual, unquestionably legal private sexual affairs of someone for partisan gain, voyeuristic fun and the soothing fulfillment of judgmental condemnation.  And in that regard, it sets a new standard: the private sexual activities of public figures — down to the most intimate details — are now inherently newsworthy, without the need for any pretense of other relevance.

I’d really like to know how many journalists, pundits and activist types clucking with righteous condemnation of Weiner would be comfortable having that standard applied to them.  I strongly suspect the number is very small.  Ever since the advent of Internet commerce, pornography — use of the Internet for sexual gratification, real or virtual — has has been, and continues to be, a huge business.  Millions upon millions of people at some point do what Weiner did.  I know that’s a shocking revelation that will cause many Good People to clutch their pearls in fragile Victorian horror, but it’s nonetheless true.  It’s also true that marital infidelity is incredibly common.

 

Weiner was stupid–really stupid.  However, what he did even if it included Congressional equipment is worth nothing more than a reprimand.  He didn’t commit a crime–he may, may have violated a rule of Congress.   This sort of hand wringing is much like what goes on when someone on the internets says a naughty word.   Not surprisingly when you spend time with some of those villagers, profanity isn’t absent yet they are terribly offended by it when the public sees it.  Weiner didn’t hire a prostitute or even involve diapers in his escapades.  He didn’t solicit anonymous sex in a public bathroom.  He was a cad.  A rather cheesy one at that.

Clown Shoes

Rod:

As Blagojevich stepped down from the witness stand, he walked over to the prosecution table and extended his hand to Assistant U.S. Atty. Reid Schar, who had cross-examined him over parts of three days. Schar, who was busy sorting papers, did not acknowledge the gesture and turned away to confer with the defense and judge at a sidebar.

Moments later, U.S. District Judge James Zagel cautioned jurors that there was a reason Schar reacted that way — lawyers are instructed not to have contact with witnesses. The judge then sent the jury home for the day.

 

In fact, judges in state court (I have no idea about federal, but I’d expect they do there as well) often make a point of this during jury selection because it also applies to jurors.  It was a cheap stunt by Blagojevich and a perfect example of what a clown he is.

When Blagojevich Understand the Law Better than You Do

Mayor Emanuel thought Blagojevich should appoint Claypool to his Congressional seat so the seat would be open again when Emanuel wanted it.

Problem?  The Governor doesn’t appoint Members of Congress to vacancies, he calls special elections.

Congratulations Chicago, your new Mayor was dumber than Blagojevich on the issue and just as arrogant in thinking a public office was his personal property.

 

In the Nov. 8, 2008 call, Emanuel tells Blagojevich in the recorded phone call that he wants Forrest Claypool tapped to fill his position after explaining: “in my interest of, uh, you know, having somebody there you know that doesn’t want to make it a lifetime commitment.”

At the time, Emanuel was leaving to be White House chief of staff but he was interested in returning to his House seat to possibly rise to Speaker.

Emanuel says that Claypool would only stay in Congress for a couple of years.

“And then he wants to go to the cabinet,” Emanuel says on the recorded phone call that was made public this afternoon in a defense filing.

Blagojevich repeatedly tells Emanuel he can’t appoint to the post. It’s got to be a special election. But Emanuel presses him.

“You would appoint somebody to finish those three weeks,” Emanuel says, if he were to leave his position early. “And then he, and then he gets, you know, all we are giving him is three weeks of a head start… it’s not like Forest doesn’t have a name or anything like that. It gives him a head start and a presumption.”

At the end of the excerpt of the call, Emanuel tells Blagojevich: “I will not forget this…
“I appreciate it. That’s all I am going to say. I don’t want to go, you and I shouldn’t go farther.”

 

My guess is that with anyone else, the last sentence wouldn’t have been necessary, but with Rod’s mouth he had to shut him up before he said something stupid.

Attacking Costello on Medicare

Really?  Attacking him for backing a popular program against creating a voucher system that wouldn’t pay enough for actual insurance for the elderly is the best the RNCC can do?

I mean, unindicted co-conspirator Jerry Costello?  And they attack on a plan where he is likely with 70 percent of his constituents?

They have to actually come up with a candidate to run against him given last cycle they ran a contestant in the RFT’s Ask a Cougar columnist contest.  Seriously.