July 2007

Missing Jim

Jim Capozzola passed away tonight. He wrote Rittenhouse Review and back when blogging was just beginning he wrote one of the most important pieces on the DC Press corps.  You probably haven’t read it, but if you read Atrios, Markos, Yglesias, etc., on the DC press, Jim is the guy that crystallized in many of our minds what is deeply wrong with that city.  Jim was one of the first people to link to me outside of the small bunch of Illinois blogs as I recall.  He linked to me back before December of 2002 and was a major source of traffic for me in 2003

We only traded a few e-mails over the years, but he was always funny.  His health had been declining and I forgot to spin by as often in the last year, but he was a fantastic and funny writer who I will miss.

Pony

Charles’ tracking put’s the Bush Approval Trend at 28.9 percent.  A new low.

Excellent analysis

The question remains one of how long the current slide can continue. Historically, presidential approval has rarely fallen into the 20s. While some polls are still giving readings in the 30s, the trend remains sharply downward. However, we are now approaching historic lows. An approval trend of about 29% implies we should see a range of polls between 24% and 34% if the trend stabilizes at its current level. Further decline would predict at least some individual polls that threaten to reach the all time low of President Truman at 22%. Given President Bush’s remaining substantial support among Republicans (CBS puts Republican approval in the current poll at 66%, but with Independent support slipping to 18%.) , a loss of that loyal support would seem necessary for a fall to such historic low levels. (Truman had much less support from Democrats than Bush has enjoyed from Republicans.)

Such a bottoming out would seem to require an open breach with Congressional Republicans, as a signal to rank and file that support of the President is no longer expected. With the immigration bill off the table, pressure for a break on that score is actually less now than last week. Iraq looms as the greater challenge, though that requires a shift of position from Congressional Republicans who have staunchly supported the war and criticized Democrats for supporting withdrawal. The double trick will be for Republican Congressional leaders to offer a face saving rationale for a change in Iraq policy while at the same time criticizing their party’s president for a failed policy. We’ve seen some efforts along this line last week. But will the floodgates open or can the President retain the support of his party on the most important issue of his presidency? If he loses that support, we will probably have to rescale the y-axis of our plots.

Bush Republican support is still at 66 percent which I find amazing given all that his administration has gone through.

The Man-Child Strikes Again

The Governor, after promising legislative leaders not to mess with the July 4th Holiday, calls a special session on the 5th.

Okay, those in the Lege who weren’t completely blaming him before, are now. I can understand a certain level of frustration in the Governor’s office given he introduced a fairly dramatic plan that did a lot of things he had been accused of ignoring and then getting pounded by everyone. I think he was gaining some momentum before I ended up taking an unplanned blog break, but that was all lost and this sort of thing is going to prolong the problem, not solve it.

Dan has a decent take on the how the caucuses operate and I think it’s important to note how he describes Madigan and the other caucus heads. They do have a lot of power, but they also have it partially because they listen to their members and their members’ concerns. They are far from innocent in creating this fiasco–well, actually the Republicans are since they didn’t have any say until overtime.

On substance, The Governor has some decent points. However, when he screws with people like this, he loses any power to leverage those decent points.

He loses all respectability with attacks like this one on Fritchey, Harris, and Feigenholtz.

The most telling story is the one Fritchey talks about where the Man-Child refuses to talk without the leadership

Now, who does that remind you of? Gee, an executive leader who refuses to talk with those he needs to resolve something with unless all of his conditions are met first.