April 2005

Dude, It Was Brilliant

Uberweis somewhat apologized for the helicopter commercial during his announcement for his Gubernatorial Campaign.

One should never apologize for one of the best political commercials ever made, even if the reason it fits in the best category is it makes the candidate look like such a Goober that no one will ever forget about it.

Oberweis offered something of an apology for a widely criticized television commercial that ran during his last Senate campaign in which he talked about immigrants taking American jobs.

“I think the commercial was too harsh and didn’t communicate our position well,” he said of the spot in which he was seen in a helicopter flying over Soldier Field, saying enough illegal immigrants were arriving in the country to fill the stadium every week.

“Many people took the commercial to understand … that I am somehow opposed to immigration,” he said. “I’m not. I’m opposed to illegal immigration.”


Polis had the best take:

Those Oberweis copter commercials may be the funniest thing on tv these days (save Arrested Development). Forget the fact that his numbers are said to be way off, just having him spout off that anti-immigrant rhetoric over the noise of copter blades is high comedy. The only thing that would improve on this would be if he was flying over the Mexican border with a rifle picking off crossing illegals. “Even if I stay up here and shoot all day, I can’t make a dent out of the thousands who are stealing YOUR jobs!”

I’m looking for an archived copy of the commercial if anyone has it out there.

25 Least Influential People

Over at Wonkette,

Sangamon State Grad Ward Churchill clocks in at #20. Leading ArchPundit to ask yet again, who the fuck is this guy and why the fuck is the conservative blogosphere bitching about such a loser?

In at #18 is Pat Sajack with no known Illinois ties, but raises the question of if a dork farts on his own web site–does he make any noise if no one is listening?

At #12 is departed Trib Columnist and emotional schlockmeister Bob Greene. Word is he is trying to get a gig as a college professor ensuring a steady supply of young women to hit on–and be rejected by as he ages.

At #9–Alan Keyes beats out fellow primaryist Steve Forbes. After all, Keyes was in Florida for the Schiavo fiasco, while Forbes was on The Apprentice looking dorky as ever.

Cross Attacks Dunn’s Plan to Send Money to the Formula

Tom Cross attacks Dunn’s position to send more money into the formula instead of into categorical assistance. Why? Because that is where suburban districts get most of their cash. Using the example of Palatine that I’ve been using for some time due to comments about the District–Palatine gets about 3% of its funding from the state under the general formula. It gets over 8% of its funding from categorical assistance which John Patterson’s article does a good job describing.

It’s hard to fault Cross for representing the concerns of relatively well off suburban districts, but frankly, the greatest need is in inner ring suburbs and rural areas where an increase in funding of the formula would help the most.

Over time categorical aid has become more significant for two reasons. First, and most legitimately, schools do a lot more than they used to including more special ed, more transportation and more special needs requirements mandated by the feds and state government. Second, relatively well off districts know they won’t get a ton from the general formula, have pushed state reps to put increases in categorical aid instead of the general fund formula.

Patterson’s article is good at pointing out the basic issues and much better than most school funding articles. Kudos for a good job.

A stain on the House

I personally want Tom DeLay around for the midterms, but it’s not looking good when the Republican Trib calls on him to step down and takes a shot at Denny for letting him stick around (of course, Denny doesn’t ‘let’ DeLay do anything–DeLay ‘lets’ Denny be Speaker since DeLay doesn’t have the votes.

But Republican leaders have to go beyond that. They can’t continue to aid the efforts by DeLay to dodge responsibility. The worst example is this: After the Ethics Committee rebuked DeLay for the third time, the GOP leadership neutered the Ethics Committee. The Republican chairman of the committee, Rep. Joel Hefley, was removed from his post over his objections, and the committee rules were changed so either party could block an investigation of a House member.

Republicans can argue that the committee chairmanship was due to rotate. But the rules change to block investigations was an incredibly blind and arrogant tactic. Don’t blame DeLay for that one. Blame House Speaker Dennis Hastert for letting it happen.

Hastert may be calculating that his friend DeLay can survive this ethics mess without doing too much damage to his party before the 2006 midterm elections. But the decision to stop the Ethics Committee from effectively doing its business stains the entire GOP leadership.

A Gallup poll released last week said only 38 percent of Americans approve of the way Congress is handling its job, while 54 percent disapprove. Mr. Speaker?

Republicans have enjoyed a good, decade-long run in control of the House. Maybe so good they’ve forgotten that they took power in large part because voters were fed up with the arrogant, ethically questionable practices of Washington. It would be ironic if the GOP lost power for the same reason.