September 2002

A Rush to Topinka In

A Rush to Topinka

In danger of becoming collateral damage to the Illinois Circular Firing Squad Team, Topinka has found some help from Bobby Rush. This could be a good sign that even with historically low Republican turnout expected given the ICFST Ticket, Topinka will have a shot. She is professional and moderate and while Dart is an okay guy, it is always nice to have responsible checks on government.

Miller reports nearly a 20 point lead for Blagojevich. This is going to be a significant drag on the rest of the ticket with only Madigan and Dart seriously challenged.

Krugman: how could a $30

Krugman: how could a $30 billion robbery take place in broad daylight?

Because if you do something so incredibly brazen no one will believe it. The Democratic Party tried to present the Bush Tax plan to voters in focus groups, they refused to believe he would pass the plan–thus, Dems didn’t fight. Being brazen has the advantage of people thinking that no one will behave that badly.

Birkett’s Blues Two good stories

Birkett’s Blues

Two good stories (and maybe more by the time I get done with the papers) about Birkett’s role in the Cruz Case.

Phil Kadner offers the appropriate way to handle such cases.

Rich Miller offers why, even with all of her faults, Lisa Madigan is the better choice.

Birkett claims his experience in capital cases is vital to the role. With all of the identified problems with the Illinois death penalty, how can anyone believe a man with his experience belongs anywhere near a death penalty case?

Steve Rhodes gives airing to

Steve Rhodes gives airing to Schipper some space regarding the conspiracy theories concerning Hamas, Oklahoma City, and Iraq. It is a conspiracy theory. Sometimes they turn out to be true, but mostly not. This probably falls in the not category.

Additionally, the theory seems to be that Hamas and Iraq cooperated on this. There is little evidence that Hamas operates outside of Israel and the immediate area. Fundraising yes, operations no.

This paragraph is especially problematic:

Schippers had come full circle. His theory: A Hamas front had trained Iraqis for participation in the Oklahoma City bombing. The path of Wright?s investigation had been converging with Davis?s all along. And bin Laden was behind the entire mess. Worse still, sources were saying the same conspirators were going to strike again.

This means Hamas, al Qaeda, and Iraq were cooperating to perform this function. This is hard to believe without substantial intelligence information.

Even stranger, why are they training for a job that really requires 2-4 people at most? At best, this is sloppy thinking.

What one seems left with is:

1) Hamas might be training in the US
2) There might be a third person involved in Oklahoma City
3) Apparently terrorists are now suing for libel?

Wanting something to be true, doesn’t make it so. And most of the “evidence” seems to be based on similar reasoning to those who compare coincidences between the Kennedy and Lincoln assassinations.