ArchPundit

Of course, I don’t have a birth certificate from the hospital. I have one from Will County which is the legal one that is accorded full faith and credit by the Constitution.  There’s a level of wingnuttery that continues to get into normal discussion that is remarkable.

Response to Tai(n)tz most recent filing

“It was deja vu all over again.”1

In  her  most  recent  tirade,  Plaintiff’s  counsel  seeks
reconsideration  of  the  Court’s  order  dismissing  this  action.     Instead 2
of seriously addressing the substance of the Court’s order, counsel
repeats her political diatribe against the President, complains that
she did not have time to address dismissal of the action (although
she  sought  expedited  consideration),  accuses  the  undersigned  of
treason, and maintains that “the United States District Courts in the

11th Circuit are subject to political pressure, external control, and
. . . subservience to the same illegitimate chain of command which
Plaintiff has previously protested.”  (Pl.’s Emergency Req. for Stay
of Deployment 2.)  This filing contemptuously ignores the Court’s

previous  admonition  that  Plaintiff’s  counsel  discontinue  her
illegitimate use of the federal judiciary to further her political
agenda.    The  Court  finds  that  the  claims  and  legal  contentions
asserted in the present motion are not warranted by existing law and
that  no  reasonable  basis  exists  to  conclude  that  Plaintiff’s
arguments  would  be  accepted  as  an  extension,  modification,  or
reversal  of  existing  law.    Simply,  put  the  motion  is  frivolous.
Moreover, the Court further finds that Plaintiff’s motion is being
presented for the improper purpose of  using the federal judiciary as
a platform to espouse controversial political beliefs rather than as
a  legitimate  forum  for  hearing  legal  claims.    Counsel’s  conduct
violates  Rule  11  of  the  Federal  Rules  of  Civil  Procedure,  and
sanctions  are  warranted.    Accordingly,  Plaintiff’s  motion  for
reconsideration (Doc. 15) is denied, and counsel for Plaintiff is
ordered  to  show  cause  why  the  Court  should  not  impose  a  monetary
penalty of $10,000.00 upon Plaintiff’s counsel for her misconduct.
Counsel shall file her response to this show cause order within 14
days of today’s order.

The new Andy Martin.