<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Another Bond Note</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/06/17/on-another-bond-note/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/06/17/on-another-bond-note/</link>
	<description>Illinois, From Misery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:39:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob_N</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/06/17/on-another-bond-note/comment-page-1/#comment-19225</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob_N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archpundit.com/blog/?p=11745#comment-19225</guid>
		<description>Metra Board members &quot;earn&quot; $15,000 for a few meetings a year. 

IIRC they are not allowed to earn any other government-funded salaries or stipends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metra Board members &#8220;earn&#8221; $15,000 for a few meetings a year. </p>
<p>IIRC they are not allowed to earn any other government-funded salaries or stipends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justaguy2</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/06/17/on-another-bond-note/comment-page-1/#comment-19224</link>
		<dc:creator>justaguy2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archpundit.com/blog/?p=11745#comment-19224</guid>
		<description>I would like to think that  we don&#039;t pay board members very much and so can&#039;t expect innovative thinking, but I&#039;m too afraid I&#039;m wrong.  What&#039;s so ironic about all this is that Banks went through the very same process about  two decades ago, going from tellers to atm&#039;s. The focus then, though wasn&#039;t the cost of the new system, but how no one was going to lose their job. But they did, because that&#039;s how they justified the cost of the atm&#039;s. Am I not surprised that they didn&#039;t cut a better deal with a card company, hoping to become customer&#039;s &quot;top card&quot; to increase the number of CC transactions and increase their take? 
I use a &quot;Transit Check&quot; for the CTA. It&#039;s deducted automatically by an online company. Couldn&#039;t they have just asked over at CTA or PACE how it&#039;s done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to think that  we don&#8217;t pay board members very much and so can&#8217;t expect innovative thinking, but I&#8217;m too afraid I&#8217;m wrong.  What&#8217;s so ironic about all this is that Banks went through the very same process about  two decades ago, going from tellers to atm&#8217;s. The focus then, though wasn&#8217;t the cost of the new system, but how no one was going to lose their job. But they did, because that&#8217;s how they justified the cost of the atm&#8217;s. Am I not surprised that they didn&#8217;t cut a better deal with a card company, hoping to become customer&#8217;s &#8220;top card&#8221; to increase the number of CC transactions and increase their take?<br />
I use a &#8220;Transit Check&#8221; for the CTA. It&#8217;s deducted automatically by an online company. Couldn&#8217;t they have just asked over at CTA or PACE how it&#8217;s done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Terrell</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/06/17/on-another-bond-note/comment-page-1/#comment-19223</link>
		<dc:creator>David Terrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archpundit.com/blog/?p=11745#comment-19223</guid>
		<description>Yep.  Left out is any calculus of increased ridership now that it&#039;s not such a pain in the a** to buy tickets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  Left out is any calculus of increased ridership now that it&#8217;s not such a pain in the a** to buy tickets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

