Comments on: Michael Bond’s 15 Days…. http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/06/16/michael-bonds-15-days/ Illinois, From Misery Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:39:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Team America http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/06/16/michael-bonds-15-days/comment-page-1/#comment-19221 Team America Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:24:59 +0000 http://archpundit.com/blog/?p=11740#comment-19221 Gents, here's the bottom line. The FEC complaint gudiance says the following: "Receipt of Complaint The Office of General Counsel (OGC) reviews each complaint to determine whether it states a violation within the jurisdiction of the Commission and satisfies the above criteria for a proper complaint. If the complaint does not meet these requirements, OGC notifies the complainant of the deficiencies. Once a complaint is deemed sufficient, OGC assigns it a Matter Under Review (MUR) number, acknowledges receipt of the complaint and informs the complainant that the Commission will notify him or her when the entire case is resolved. Until then, the Commission is required by law to keep its actions regarding the MUR confidential." Apparently, the FEC thought the complaint was good enough to assign it a MUR number (and not return it to Venturi for deficiences), and force Michael Bond to respond. Let's see how Bond tries to weasel out of it. Cheers, TA Gents, here’s the bottom line. The FEC complaint gudiance says the following:

“Receipt of Complaint

The Office of General Counsel (OGC) reviews each complaint to determine whether it states a violation within the jurisdiction of the Commission and satisfies the above criteria for a proper complaint. If the complaint does not meet these requirements, OGC notifies the complainant of the deficiencies.

Once a complaint is deemed sufficient, OGC assigns it a Matter Under Review (MUR) number, acknowledges receipt of the complaint and informs the complainant that the Commission will notify him or her when the entire case is resolved. Until then, the Commission is required by law to keep its actions regarding the MUR confidential.”

Apparently, the FEC thought the complaint was good enough to assign it a MUR number (and not return it to Venturi for deficiences), and force Michael Bond to respond.

Let’s see how Bond tries to weasel out of it.

Cheers, TA

]]> By: Rob_N http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/06/16/michael-bonds-15-days/comment-page-1/#comment-19217 Rob_N Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:44:27 +0000 http://archpundit.com/blog/?p=11740#comment-19217 Seeing as how <a href="http://thecapitolfaxblog.com/2009/06/16/bad-connections/#comment-9431477" rel="nofollow">Team America quickly admitted Kirk's supporters are doing this just to get some negative press against Bond</a> the only question is whether this is "craptacular" or merely "hacktacular". Seeing as how Team America quickly admitted Kirk’s supporters are doing this just to get some negative press against Bond the only question is whether this is “craptacular” or merely “hacktacular”.

]]>