Comments on: Time To Contact Your Legislators http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/03/18/time-to-contact-your-legislators/ Illinois, From Misery Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:39:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: OneMan http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/03/18/time-to-contact-your-legislators/comment-page-1/#comment-19117 OneMan Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:13:37 +0000 http://archpundit.com/blog/?p=11527#comment-19117 Also on (3) it seems to me that if you had a group of Nuns running a clinic they are kind of forced to offer the services. You really want to get the Catholic Church out of the charity health care business? Seriously, how do you work around 3 in that case? Also on (3) it seems to me that if you had a group of Nuns running a clinic they are kind of forced to offer the services.

You really want to get the Catholic Church out of the charity health care business? Seriously, how do you work around 3 in that case?

]]> By: OneMan http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/03/18/time-to-contact-your-legislators/comment-page-1/#comment-19116 OneMan Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:05:39 +0000 http://archpundit.com/blog/?p=11527#comment-19116 Sorry man but I think the Sun Times is partially right on this, why because there is nothing in this about practice scope, so your Opthomologist would have to deal with this. Your Opthomologist or ENT doctor dosen't give you the warning in (1) and you then ask them for BC or a day after prescription they have to provide or risk losing their license. Putting it another way, would you be comfortable with all of these restrictions if they had to be in place so your doctor had the option not to talk about the power of prayer. Lets look at the proposal... 1) So if someone asks my wife about a repoductive health thing that is out of scope of her practice put not out of scope of her license she would have to pre-inform her employer if she had an objection? 3) You have a practice with two employees husband and wife who share a viewpoint, sounds like one of them has to cave? 4) A undo hardship definition? Who gets to define that? We can't afford to hire another person so you have to share the information. If you violate this you can lose your ability to work (B).... Are the current regulations that allow someone to site personal objections on this subject really that bad? Sorry man but I think the Sun Times is partially right on this, why because there is nothing in this about practice scope, so your Opthomologist would have to deal with this.

Your Opthomologist or ENT doctor dosen’t give you the warning in (1) and you then ask them for BC or a day after prescription they have to provide or risk losing their license.

Putting it another way, would you be comfortable with all of these restrictions if they had to be in place so your doctor had the option not to talk about the power of prayer.

Lets look at the proposal…

1) So if someone asks my wife about a repoductive health thing that is out of scope of her practice put not out of scope of her license she would have to pre-inform her employer if she had an objection?

3) You have a practice with two employees husband and wife who share a viewpoint, sounds like one of them has to cave?

4) A undo hardship definition? Who gets to define that? We can’t afford to hire another person so you have to share the information.

If you violate this you can lose your ability to work (B)….

Are the current regulations that allow someone to site personal objections on this subject really that bad?

]]>