<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senator Burris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/01/02/senator-burris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/01/02/senator-burris/</link>
	<description>Illinois, From Misery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vasyl</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2009/01/02/senator-burris/comment-page-1/#comment-18864</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archpundit.com/blog/?p=11164#comment-18864</guid>
		<description>Among the substantive reasons I&#039;m not happy with the Burris appointment is that, in addition to being a mediocre officeholder, he seems stuck in the past.  He seems to think that everything is like it was in Springfield in the early 1980s: everyone is chummy, there&#039;s not much outside scrutiny, and what&#039;s important is showing up at the state fair every year with some fun schtick.

Well, not even Springfield is like that anymore -- the level of scrutiny and professionalism in state politics has increased tremendously since the 1990s.  And Washington was never quite that genteel even in the 1980s.

A big part of the change is the internet and the influence of bloggers, changing the level of scrutiny a public official receives.  Moreover, there is a lot more irreverence in how news is covered by bloggers.

Poor Rolans wasn&#039;t able to keep in 1994 when he ran for Governor, and he certainly can&#039;t keep up now.  It&#039;s a big reason why Larry is right when he wrote that Burris has no idea how much his reputation is going to be hurt by playing along with this appointment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the substantive reasons I&#8217;m not happy with the Burris appointment is that, in addition to being a mediocre officeholder, he seems stuck in the past.  He seems to think that everything is like it was in Springfield in the early 1980s: everyone is chummy, there&#8217;s not much outside scrutiny, and what&#8217;s important is showing up at the state fair every year with some fun schtick.</p>
<p>Well, not even Springfield is like that anymore &#8212; the level of scrutiny and professionalism in state politics has increased tremendously since the 1990s.  And Washington was never quite that genteel even in the 1980s.</p>
<p>A big part of the change is the internet and the influence of bloggers, changing the level of scrutiny a public official receives.  Moreover, there is a lot more irreverence in how news is covered by bloggers.</p>
<p>Poor Rolans wasn&#8217;t able to keep in 1994 when he ran for Governor, and he certainly can&#8217;t keep up now.  It&#8217;s a big reason why Larry is right when he wrote that Burris has no idea how much his reputation is going to be hurt by playing along with this appointment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
