Comments on: Clarification, Apology, and The Big Picture—Updated for Clarity and some more discussion http://archpundit.com/blog/2008/09/19/clarification-apology-and-the-big-picture/ Illinois, From Misery Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:42:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: leo http://archpundit.com/blog/2008/09/19/clarification-apology-and-the-big-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-18211 leo Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:39:52 +0000 http://archpundit.com/blog/?p=10303#comment-18211 Basically "PersonalPAC" had a choice between a pro-choice Republican & a pro-choice Democrat and they chose the Republican. Why would anyone with a buck to contribute give it to such a clueless organization? Basically “PersonalPAC” had a choice between a pro-choice Republican & a pro-choice Democrat and they chose the Republican.

Why would anyone with a buck to contribute give it to such a clueless organization?

]]> By: Ellen Beth http://archpundit.com/blog/2008/09/19/clarification-apology-and-the-big-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-18210 Ellen Beth Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:45:27 +0000 http://archpundit.com/blog/?p=10303#comment-18210 Arch, it's the same problem we have with these pro-choice organizations here in the Tenth. They short sightedly support someone like Mark Kirk who has made some pro-choice votes, but is wholly unreliable for the issue in the larger sense in his support for anti-choice republicans. He raised large amounts of money for McCain and Palin and has contributed to a host of anti-choice congressional candidates. He is also wholly unreliable for difficult votes like that one about the falsely named partial birth abortions. He fleas when the going gets tough. I cannot for the life of me understand why he's supported by some pro-choice organizations when we have a much more reliable vote in Dan Seals and Dan would not support these anti-choice republicans. Arch, it’s the same problem we have with these pro-choice organizations here in the Tenth. They short sightedly support someone like Mark Kirk who has made some pro-choice votes, but is wholly unreliable for the issue in the larger sense in his support for anti-choice republicans. He raised large amounts of money for McCain and Palin and has contributed to a host of anti-choice congressional candidates. He is also wholly unreliable for difficult votes like that one about the falsely named partial birth abortions. He fleas when the going gets tough. I cannot for the life of me understand why he’s supported by some pro-choice organizations when we have a much more reliable vote in Dan Seals and Dan would not support these anti-choice republicans.

]]>