http://johnbrownks.blogspot.com/2008/03/fraud-or-legitimate-pundit-taylor-marsh.html

I suspect some might be a bit amused … (and, btw, there’s follow-up)

Or maybe this be Arch’s I-70 twin (at the other end of Missouri).

He voted against the Rail Safety Act, DC voters, giving going wages to government construction workers, S/CHIP, adjusting the AMT, prescription drug imports, mortgage reforms, etc., ad nauseum. Oh, but he did vote for tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts…for the rich.

I hope that we show this dick to the door for good in the upcoming election. Buh bye asshole.

Brownback to speak at pro-life Banquet (James D’Angelo)
Northwestern Students for Life vs College Feminists (D’Angelo)
Conservatives speak on Darfur Crisis(Will Upton)

So, yeah. Not exactly an unbiased source. But if you think the best way to keep Kirk in office is to expose an instructor at Northwestern for telling people he, well, is an instructor at Northwestern, then, I wish you luck.

Define moral values.

To me, I find Kirk’s continual support for an illegal & immoral war much more morally unacceptable than some trivial & unwarranted “concern” about Dan Seals’ financial condition.

Kirk is about as transparent as mud.

I wonder, Good Deal calls himself “Good Deal” but are his comments really a good deal? What value is there in these fibs that Good Deal promotes?

And just how is it that Good Deal can afford to spend so much time at a computer terminal, typing out three whole paragraphs of schlock, at a time when access to the Internet can run in the tens of dollars per month?

I ask the North Shore, can they really afford this supposed “Good Deal” and GD’s obvious lack of moral values, let alone some non sequitor about GD having the appearance of wanting a leadership position in a cess pool just because I know how to type the phrase “cess pool”?

(Anybody have a picture of a seal? Or a rooster?)

If this is all the opposition can dig up they must truly be desperate.

What a joke.

That’s not a question. The two questions brought up are:

1) Was he entitled to say he was an adjunct before the class begun.

2) Whether he can say he is an adjunct while campaigning.

You are inventing an entirely different issue.

On the North Shore we have moral values and want leaders who will represent us well. Judging from the cesspool in State government, the patronage brigade in Cook County, and your advocacy for Seals it’s clear you don’t share those values.

The bigger issue with Seals is pay to play. How does one afford to run for Congress for 3 years, not have a job and live in one of the most expensive communities in the State, while raising three kids? He should release his tax returns.

Unfortunately, in your state of willful partisan idiocy such attempts, apparently, are futile.

You are Frank Burns–worried about everything, but what’s important. It’s not going to get any traction because he’s doing what everyone else does–point out where they work. But nice try.