<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Medium Sized City</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archpundit.com/blog/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/</link>
	<description>Illinois, From Misery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:34:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/comment-page-1/#comment-6792</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/#comment-6792</guid>
		<description>This is some weak brew from the Hillary camp.  Shows how they have nothing decent to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is some weak brew from the Hillary camp.  Shows how they have nothing decent to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob_N</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/comment-page-1/#comment-6794</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob_N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/#comment-6794</guid>
		<description>Obamafan asks, &quot;Come on everybody–it’s just something to say. What are the Clintonistas going to say?&quot;

...Well, she could 9/11 start talking 9/11 about her experience 9/11 and how it has 9/11 prepared 9/11 her for higher 9/11 office, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/01/clinton_reaches.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;or something like that&lt;/a&gt;.

(Is it just me, or does Bill looked PO&#039;ed beyond all get out? Last night and still today, the smiles look very forced. Maybe I&#039;m just biased.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obamafan asks, &#8220;Come on everybody–it’s just something to say. What are the Clintonistas going to say?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;Well, she could 9/11 start talking 9/11 about her experience 9/11 and how it has 9/11 prepared 9/11 her for higher 9/11 office, <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/01/clinton_reaches.html" rel="nofollow">or something like that</a>.</p>
<p>(Is it just me, or does Bill looked PO&#8217;ed beyond all get out? Last night and still today, the smiles look very forced. Maybe I&#8217;m just biased.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obamafan</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/comment-page-1/#comment-6793</link>
		<dc:creator>Obamafan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/#comment-6793</guid>
		<description>Come on everybody--it&#039;s just something to say.  What are the Clintonistas going to say?  &quot;Wow, we got our asses thumped in Iowa--I&#039;m embarrassed and worried that Hillary might lose the election?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on everybody&#8211;it&#8217;s just something to say.  What are the Clintonistas going to say?  &#8220;Wow, we got our asses thumped in Iowa&#8211;I&#8217;m embarrassed and worried that Hillary might lose the election?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Beaudrot</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/comment-page-1/#comment-6789</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Beaudrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/#comment-6789</guid>
		<description>Also worth pointing out ... there were 235K caucus goers in Iowa.

In 2004, there were about 225,000 voters in the &lt;em&gt;New Hampshire&lt;/em&gt; Democratic primary.

Iowa&#039;s caucus turnout is now roughly equivalent to low levels of turnout in an actual presidential primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also worth pointing out &#8230; there were 235K caucus goers in Iowa.</p>
<p>In 2004, there were about 225,000 voters in the <em>New Hampshire</em> Democratic primary.</p>
<p>Iowa&#8217;s caucus turnout is now roughly equivalent to low levels of turnout in an actual presidential primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Beaudrot</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/comment-page-1/#comment-6791</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Beaudrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/#comment-6791</guid>
		<description>Also worth pointing out ... there were 235K caucus goers in Iowa.

In 2004, there were about 225,000 voters in the Democratic primary.

Iowa&#039;s caucus turnout is now roughly equivalent to low levels of turnout in an actual presidential primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also worth pointing out &#8230; there were 235K caucus goers in Iowa.</p>
<p>In 2004, there were about 225,000 voters in the Democratic primary.</p>
<p>Iowa&#8217;s caucus turnout is now roughly equivalent to low levels of turnout in an actual presidential primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob_N</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/comment-page-1/#comment-6790</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob_N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2008/01/04/a-medium-sized-city/#comment-6790</guid>
		<description>To me, it reads as if he was talking about the number of caucus-goers... which was in the hundreds of thousands, not millions. I&#039;ve never heard of mayors being &quot;elected&quot; through a caucus though.

That said, comparing total populations isn&#039;t apples to apples since not everyone in a given population is a partisan with a declared party preference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, it reads as if he was talking about the number of caucus-goers&#8230; which was in the hundreds of thousands, not millions. I&#8217;ve never heard of mayors being &#8220;elected&#8221; through a caucus though.</p>
<p>That said, comparing total populations isn&#8217;t apples to apples since not everyone in a given population is a partisan with a declared party preference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

