<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Dolt:  Ray Haninia:  Rod Blagojevich is No Harold Washington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/08/31/daily-dolt-ray-haninia-rod-blagojevich-is-no-harold-washington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/08/31/daily-dolt-ray-haninia-rod-blagojevich-is-no-harold-washington/</link>
	<description>Illinois, From Misery</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vasyl</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/08/31/daily-dolt-ray-haninia-rod-blagojevich-is-no-harold-washington/#comment-1964</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2007/08/31/daily-dolt-ray-haninia-rod-blagojevich-is-no-harold-washington/#comment-1964</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Madigan had a shot at ousting Blagojevich in the last election. He took it and he lost.&lt;/I&gt;

?????

What is he talking about here?  There was no Madigan-back primary challenge to Blagojevich in the last election, and while he was unenthusiastic, Madigan did support Blagojevich in the general.

And here's where Hanania's argument falls apart: Blagojevich did not campaign on a health care plan financed by a gross receipt tax.  If he were explicit about this plan, and then won the election, Hanania might have a point about defying the will of the voters.  (He's still be wrong about deferring to the executive, but whatever.)  Instead, Blagojevich was pretty adamant about running on a platform that he would not increase general taxes, and never mentioned a word about Illinois Covered and the GRT.

The voters aren't psychic, so it's tough to see how they were backing the GRT and Illinois Covered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Madigan had a shot at ousting Blagojevich in the last election. He took it and he lost.</i></p>
<p>?????</p>
<p>What is he talking about here?  There was no Madigan-back primary challenge to Blagojevich in the last election, and while he was unenthusiastic, Madigan did support Blagojevich in the general.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s where Hanania&#8217;s argument falls apart: Blagojevich did not campaign on a health care plan financed by a gross receipt tax.  If he were explicit about this plan, and then won the election, Hanania might have a point about defying the will of the voters.  (He&#8217;s still be wrong about deferring to the executive, but whatever.)  Instead, Blagojevich was pretty adamant about running on a platform that he would not increase general taxes, and never mentioned a word about Illinois Covered and the GRT.</p>
<p>The voters aren&#8217;t psychic, so it&#8217;s tough to see how they were backing the GRT and Illinois Covered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/08/31/daily-dolt-ray-haninia-rod-blagojevich-is-no-harold-washington/#comment-1963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 02:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2007/08/31/daily-dolt-ray-haninia-rod-blagojevich-is-no-harold-washington/#comment-1963</guid>
		<description>I'd never heard of this Hanania clown before your post. What an idiot he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d never heard of this Hanania clown before your post. What an idiot he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
