<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Assault on Parody</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/05/30/the-assault-on-parody/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/05/30/the-assault-on-parody/</link>
	<description>Illinois, From Misery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cons take &#38;#8220;Fair and Balanced&#38;#8221; literally &#38;laquo; Illinois Reason</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/05/30/the-assault-on-parody/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Cons take &#38;#8220;Fair and Balanced&#38;#8221; literally &#38;laquo; Illinois Reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2007/05/30/the-assault-on-parody/#comment-829</guid>
		<description>[...] Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 in &quot;Grassroots&quot; Conservatives by robnesvacil   First, the conservatives spoke up for germs because germs, you see, have no discernible mouths (let alone vocal chords or lungs) and cannot speak for themselves. Conservatives seemed to be telling us that the USDA didn&#8217;t really need to inspect as many cattle as they&#8217;re supposed to because germs like the Mad Cow Virus and E. coli have rights too and we wouldn&#8217;t want to impede on their rights to privacy, interstate mobility or, heaven forfend, profit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 in &#8220;Grassroots&#8221; Conservatives by robnesvacil   First, the conservatives spoke up for germs because germs, you see, have no discernible mouths (let alone vocal chords or lungs) and cannot speak for themselves. Conservatives seemed to be telling us that the USDA didn&#38;#8217;t really need to inspect as many cattle as they&#38;#8217;re supposed to because germs like the Mad Cow Virus and E. coli have rights too and we wouldn&#38;#8217;t want to impede on their rights to privacy, interstate mobility or, heaven forfend, profit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry 101</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/05/30/the-assault-on-parody/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry 101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2007/05/30/the-assault-on-parody/#comment-828</guid>
		<description>mad cow disease isn&#039;t E-Coli.
Its a brain wasting disease that is absolutely untreatable, and, if transmitted to a human, 100% lethal, generally within a few months.  Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is the human version that is believed to be caused by eating mad-cow tainted animal products.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creutzfeldt-Jakob_disease

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_cow_disease

It&#039;s worse than E-Coli, though less common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mad cow disease isn&#8217;t E-Coli.<br />
Its a brain wasting disease that is absolutely untreatable, and, if transmitted to a human, 100% lethal, generally within a few months.  Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is the human version that is believed to be caused by eating mad-cow tainted animal products.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creutzfeldt-Jakob_disease" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creutzfeldt-Jakob_disease</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_cow_disease" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_cow_disease</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s worse than E-Coli, though less common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArchPundit</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/05/30/the-assault-on-parody/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>ArchPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 11:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2007/05/30/the-assault-on-parody/#comment-827</guid>
		<description>Which is why it was a really stupid argument then.

The only good false positive argument I&#039;ve seen *recently* is Floyd Landis&#039;.  And even then it&#039;s not so much a great argument as much as less stupid than the other arguments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is why it was a really stupid argument then.</p>
<p>The only good false positive argument I&#8217;ve seen *recently* is Floyd Landis&#8217;.  And even then it&#8217;s not so much a great argument as much as less stupid than the other arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal Skinner</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/05/30/the-assault-on-parody/comment-page-1/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 02:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2007/05/30/the-assault-on-parody/#comment-826</guid>
		<description>The false positive part sounds like 1990 arguments against HIV testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The false positive part sounds like 1990 arguments against HIV testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
