<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andy Schlafly&#8217;s New Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/01/31/andy-schlaflys-new-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/01/31/andy-schlaflys-new-project/</link>
	<description>Illinois, From Misery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:39:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kooks put the &#38;#8220;con&#38;#8221; in conservative &#38;laquo; Illinois Reason</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/01/31/andy-schlaflys-new-project/comment-page-1/#comment-2434</link>
		<dc:creator>Kooks put the &#38;#8220;con&#38;#8221; in conservative &#38;laquo; Illinois Reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2007/01/31/andy-schlaflys-new-project/#comment-2434</guid>
		<description>[...] Her tweedle sons Roger and Andy were infamous for spreading perhaps the most bizarre spin known to the early Internets. Andy Schlafly is apparently still at it. This time, he finds that the truth just isn&#8217;t true enough so a newer, truer, super-truthy wiki was in order. A.S. was just the man for the job and thus from out his A.S.S. he birthed &#8220;Conservapedia&#8221; (giving rational conservatives everywhere a black eye). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Her tweedle sons Roger and Andy were infamous for spreading perhaps the most bizarre spin known to the early Internets. Andy Schlafly is apparently still at it. This time, he finds that the truth just isn&#38;#8217;t true enough so a newer, truer, super-truthy wiki was in order. A.S. was just the man for the job and thus from out his A.S.S. he birthed &#38;#8220;Conservapedia&#38;#8221; (giving rational conservatives everywhere a black eye). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oat Paste</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/01/31/andy-schlaflys-new-project/comment-page-1/#comment-2433</link>
		<dc:creator>Oat Paste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2007/01/31/andy-schlaflys-new-project/#comment-2433</guid>
		<description>I just visited Conservapedia. I heard about this site on NPR. It was hard to believe that the site was not a parody. Talk about Spin!

I whole heartedly agree with Keanus. Though I may visit the sight from time to time, as I convert all of my work to &quot;faith-based&quot; metallurgy, organic chemistry, high energy physics, and computer programming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just visited Conservapedia. I heard about this site on NPR. It was hard to believe that the site was not a parody. Talk about Spin!</p>
<p>I whole heartedly agree with Keanus. Though I may visit the sight from time to time, as I convert all of my work to &#8220;faith-based&#8221; metallurgy, organic chemistry, high energy physics, and computer programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keanus</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2007/01/31/andy-schlaflys-new-project/comment-page-1/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>Keanus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2007/01/31/andy-schlaflys-new-project/#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Yes, that&#039;s right. Wikipedia is liberally biased.&lt;/i&gt;

No, you&#039;re wrong. The problem isn&#039;t that Wikipedia is liberally biased, but that, as Stephen Colbert astutely observed &quot;...reality has a liberal bias.&quot; The only was to build a &quot;conservapedia&quot; is to describe a non-existent reality, in other words a fantasy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yes, that&#8217;s right. Wikipedia is liberally biased.</i></p>
<p>No, you&#8217;re wrong. The problem isn&#8217;t that Wikipedia is liberally biased, but that, as Stephen Colbert astutely observed &#8220;&#8230;reality has a liberal bias.&#8221; The only was to build a &#8220;conservapedia&#8221; is to describe a non-existent reality, in other words a fantasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

