<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeff Greenfield, Brought to you By Brooks Brothers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/12/jeff-greenfield-brought-to-you-by-brooks-brothers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/12/jeff-greenfield-brought-to-you-by-brooks-brothers/</link>
	<description>Illinois, From Misery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:39:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArchPundit &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Ha Ha</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/12/jeff-greenfield-brought-to-you-by-brooks-brothers/comment-page-1/#comment-7176</link>
		<dc:creator>ArchPundit &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Ha Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/12/12/jeff-greenfield-brought-to-you-by-brooks-brothers/#comment-7176</guid>
		<description>[...] Greenfield is arguing the blogs don&#8217;t get his humor. He thinks it was just poor delivery and that the bloggers didn&#8217;t get his joke. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Greenfield is arguing the blogs don&#38;#8217;t get his humor. He thinks it was just poor delivery and that the bloggers didn&#38;#8217;t get his joke. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NW burbs</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/12/jeff-greenfield-brought-to-you-by-brooks-brothers/comment-page-1/#comment-7175</link>
		<dc:creator>NW burbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/12/12/jeff-greenfield-brought-to-you-by-brooks-brothers/#comment-7175</guid>
		<description>What a jackass.

Did Greenfield complain about Bush rolling up his sleeves one roll too many while telling America that Brownie was doing a heckuva job?

The button down shirt with jacket but sans tie is the in political look these days. Pollsters must think it makes the guys look approachable. Bush has been known to do it on occasion too.

And did anyone else catch the irony of the fact Greenfield was babbling on about &quot;Iraq Hussein Osama&quot; with a guy named &quot;Shotgun Howitzer&quot;?

And don&#039;t even get me started about brown socks and their implications for Middle Eastern policy, let alone the state of boxers vs. briefs in the debate over nuclear proliferation on the Indian sub-continent.

How did I get Greenfield&#039;s paycheck? I can rattle off inconsequential gobbledy-gook twice as long as him -- and I&#039;m younger and better looking (in my jacket and shirt... but no tie).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a jackass.</p>
<p>Did Greenfield complain about Bush rolling up his sleeves one roll too many while telling America that Brownie was doing a heckuva job?</p>
<p>The button down shirt with jacket but sans tie is the in political look these days. Pollsters must think it makes the guys look approachable. Bush has been known to do it on occasion too.</p>
<p>And did anyone else catch the irony of the fact Greenfield was babbling on about &#8220;Iraq Hussein Osama&#8221; with a guy named &#8220;Shotgun Howitzer&#8221;?</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t even get me started about brown socks and their implications for Middle Eastern policy, let alone the state of boxers vs. briefs in the debate over nuclear proliferation on the Indian sub-continent.</p>
<p>How did I get Greenfield&#8217;s paycheck? I can rattle off inconsequential gobbledy-gook twice as long as him &#8212; and I&#8217;m younger and better looking (in my jacket and shirt&#8230; but no tie).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grand old partisan</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/12/jeff-greenfield-brought-to-you-by-brooks-brothers/comment-page-1/#comment-7174</link>
		<dc:creator>grand old partisan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/12/12/jeff-greenfield-brought-to-you-by-brooks-brothers/#comment-7174</guid>
		<description>This is what happens when you get too &quot;hot&quot; too early.

Everyone wants to do stories about Obama, but there just isn&#039;t that much to say for the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what happens when you get too &#8220;hot&#8221; too early.</p>
<p>Everyone wants to do stories about Obama, but there just isn&#8217;t that much to say for the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellen</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/12/jeff-greenfield-brought-to-you-by-brooks-brothers/comment-page-1/#comment-7173</link>
		<dc:creator>ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/12/12/jeff-greenfield-brought-to-you-by-brooks-brothers/#comment-7173</guid>
		<description>Now that Obama&#039;s true leanings have been exposed by this insightful critique of his dress, can we have a serious conversation about why Obama hates America?

Somebody should tell the bosses--I&#039;ll do Greenfield&#039;s job for half the pay.

Lately it feels like we&#039;re inside a very satirical book or play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Obama&#8217;s true leanings have been exposed by this insightful critique of his dress, can we have a serious conversation about why Obama hates America?</p>
<p>Somebody should tell the bosses&#8211;I&#8217;ll do Greenfield&#8217;s job for half the pay.</p>
<p>Lately it feels like we&#8217;re inside a very satirical book or play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

