<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Chink in the Armor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/08/the-chink-in-the-armor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/08/the-chink-in-the-armor/</link>
	<description>Illinois, From Misery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:39:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/08/the-chink-in-the-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-7172</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/12/08/the-chink-in-the-armor/#comment-7172</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;He is guilty, and he is basically corrupt. I just wish people would come to terms with the hypocrisy.&lt;/i&gt;

You are an evil little swine; Of course, you&#039;re probably Republican, which would make you a Satan-worshipper as well.

In case you&#039;re wondering, I have as much basis for my statement as you do for yours, but mine is more likely to be correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>He is guilty, and he is basically corrupt. I just wish people would come to terms with the hypocrisy.</i></p>
<p>You are an evil little swine; Of course, you&#8217;re probably Republican, which would make you a Satan-worshipper as well.</p>
<p>In case you&#8217;re wondering, I have as much basis for my statement as you do for yours, but mine is more likely to be correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corvax</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/08/the-chink-in-the-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-7171</link>
		<dc:creator>corvax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/12/08/the-chink-in-the-armor/#comment-7171</guid>
		<description>I agree that it looks best if all the paperwork shows what you outlined, but if the seller rejected a higher bid to accept Obama&#039;s bid for the house, that doesn&#039;t necessarily make it worse for Obama. he is not likely to have known about the amount of the other bid and certainly had no reponsibility for the seller&#039;s action. the seller may have been willing to leave a couple dollars on the table to have bragging rights for having dealt with such a celebrity on such a matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it looks best if all the paperwork shows what you outlined, but if the seller rejected a higher bid to accept Obama&#8217;s bid for the house, that doesn&#8217;t necessarily make it worse for Obama. he is not likely to have known about the amount of the other bid and certainly had no reponsibility for the seller&#8217;s action. the seller may have been willing to leave a couple dollars on the table to have bragging rights for having dealt with such a celebrity on such a matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/08/the-chink-in-the-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-7170</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/12/08/the-chink-in-the-armor/#comment-7170</guid>
		<description>He is guilty, and he is basically corrupt.  I just wish people would come to terms with the hypocrisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is guilty, and he is basically corrupt.  I just wish people would come to terms with the hypocrisy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiram Wurf</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/08/the-chink-in-the-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-7169</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiram Wurf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/12/08/the-chink-in-the-armor/#comment-7169</guid>
		<description>If I were to bet, my bet would be that if this comes up as a campaign commercial it won&#039;t be directly from Hillary, but from someone else in the field or a &quot;new&quot; group.  Obama could be leading the pack then - so that could be part of the motivation.  Regardless, it may or may not be that somebody does it for Hillary.  Last cycle Gephardt and Kerry people banded together to attack Dean with the newly created for the &#039;cause&#039; 527 &quot;Americans for Jobs, Health Care and Progressive Values.&quot;  There is potential for irony in that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opensecrets.org/527s/527events.asp?orgid=42&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;current Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs, a former John Kerry presidential spokesman, was the spokesman for the 527 group&lt;/a&gt;.  I suppose on the upside, Gibbs is experienced in how these things work.  One hopes for Obama&#039;s sake they&#039;re prepared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were to bet, my bet would be that if this comes up as a campaign commercial it won&#8217;t be directly from Hillary, but from someone else in the field or a &#8220;new&#8221; group.  Obama could be leading the pack then &#8211; so that could be part of the motivation.  Regardless, it may or may not be that somebody does it for Hillary.  Last cycle Gephardt and Kerry people banded together to attack Dean with the newly created for the &#8217;cause&#8217; 527 &#8220;Americans for Jobs, Health Care and Progressive Values.&#8221;  There is potential for irony in that <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/527s/527events.asp?orgid=42" rel="nofollow">current Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs, a former John Kerry presidential spokesman, was the spokesman for the 527 group</a>.  I suppose on the upside, Gibbs is experienced in how these things work.  One hopes for Obama&#8217;s sake they&#8217;re prepared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsquare</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/12/08/the-chink-in-the-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-7168</link>
		<dc:creator>tsquare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 21:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/12/08/the-chink-in-the-armor/#comment-7168</guid>
		<description>I for one look foreward to Obama meeting tht wood chipper called the Clinton Political Machine.

Let&#039;s see what he looks like when he comes out shall we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one look foreward to Obama meeting tht wood chipper called the Clinton Political Machine.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what he looks like when he comes out shall we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

