<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Breaking Fast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/</link>
	<description>Illinois, From Misery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:39:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: leo</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4222</link>
		<dc:creator>leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4222</guid>
		<description>Rather than concentrate on individuals, I think it&#039;s important to get out there and canvass this weekend.  It&#039;s only by reaching out to people and getting out the word, that we&#039;re ever going to get our Candidates elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than concentrate on individuals, I think it&#8217;s important to get out there and canvass this weekend.  It&#8217;s only by reaching out to people and getting out the word, that we&#8217;re ever going to get our Candidates elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArchPundit</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4221</link>
		<dc:creator>ArchPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4221</guid>
		<description>Oh no, you are perfectly fine and a good tip--my point was to further clarify how I was handling it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no, you are perfectly fine and a good tip&#8211;my point was to further clarify how I was handling it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nyberg</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4220</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nyberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4220</guid>
		<description>Arch, I hope I didn&#039;t give the impression I was second guessing your decision. Proviso Township has been at the forefront of using blogs to skirt libel law. I was sharing info that others may find useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arch, I hope I didn&#8217;t give the impression I was second guessing your decision. Proviso Township has been at the forefront of using blogs to skirt libel law. I was sharing info that others may find useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArchPundit</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4219</link>
		<dc:creator>ArchPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4219</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t screen the comments until afterwards--and it&#039;s more of an ethical thing with me.  I can&#039;t personally confirm the information, though I have very good sources.  So I&#039;m willing to do the tease, but not willing to put the name out there.

If nothing else, if I&#039;m wrong, it would be unfair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t screen the comments until afterwards&#8211;and it&#8217;s more of an ethical thing with me.  I can&#8217;t personally confirm the information, though I have very good sources.  So I&#8217;m willing to do the tease, but not willing to put the name out there.</p>
<p>If nothing else, if I&#8217;m wrong, it would be unfair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nyberg</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4218</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nyberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4218</guid>
		<description>Legal tip for bloggers.

I got sued for defamation once and I learned a useful piece of info from an attorney.

A blogger can&#039;t get sued for something someone else writes in the comments. The big companies got legislation passed that protects them.

For example, when I was sued for defamation Blogger (Google) wasn&#039;t named as a co-defendent. I was responsible for what I wrote on their server.

The same law protects bloggers from being sued for comments posted on a blog.

This is one of the reasons I don&#039;t like moderated comments. If I read a post and OK it for the comments I&#039;m concerned I&#039;ve become a party to the comment that may be defamatory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legal tip for bloggers.</p>
<p>I got sued for defamation once and I learned a useful piece of info from an attorney.</p>
<p>A blogger can&#8217;t get sued for something someone else writes in the comments. The big companies got legislation passed that protects them.</p>
<p>For example, when I was sued for defamation Blogger (Google) wasn&#8217;t named as a co-defendent. I was responsible for what I wrote on their server.</p>
<p>The same law protects bloggers from being sued for comments posted on a blog.</p>
<p>This is one of the reasons I don&#8217;t like moderated comments. If I read a post and OK it for the comments I&#8217;m concerned I&#8217;ve become a party to the comment that may be defamatory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArchPundit</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4217</link>
		<dc:creator>ArchPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4217</guid>
		<description>And sorry for the deletions, but I think Carl&#039;s solution satisfies me and everyone wanting to know more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And sorry for the deletions, but I think Carl&#8217;s solution satisfies me and everyone wanting to know more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArchPundit</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4216</link>
		<dc:creator>ArchPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4216</guid>
		<description>Separate and from three different sources (today)---I didn&#039;t know about the Kos bit until I sat down to post it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Separate and from three different sources (today)&#8212;I didn&#8217;t know about the Kos bit until I sat down to post it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Mobson</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4215</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Mobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4215</guid>
		<description>ArchPundit, did you get this rumor from the DailyKos diary or do you have a seperate source?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ArchPundit, did you get this rumor from the DailyKos diary or do you have a seperate source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArchPundit</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4214</link>
		<dc:creator>ArchPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4214</guid>
		<description>Really, let&#039;s not discuss the specific individual until it breaks. I understand the impulse, but for now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, let&#8217;s not discuss the specific individual until it breaks. I understand the impulse, but for now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toniD</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4213</link>
		<dc:creator>toniD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4213</guid>
		<description>We have two hot districts here in Illinois,
 Destrict 10, Haster vs Laesh
 District 6, Rskam vs Duckworth

My bet is Hastert!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have two hot districts here in Illinois,<br />
 Destrict 10, Haster vs Laesh<br />
 District 6, Rskam vs Duckworth</p>
<p>My bet is Hastert!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Houghton</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4212</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Houghton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4212</guid>
		<description>I note for the record that a 2% lead is well within most MoEs, and would hardly count as a pickup to the extent that this is being described.

I also note that ArchPundit did not address the 11th (Weller), who has a two-month-old and could, therefore, legitimately withdraw for family reasons.

Hasert (14) is too much to hope.  Shimkus (19) is probably the best bet--but it will all be moot soon anyway.

Maybe they could run Alan Keyes for the vacancy as a write-in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note for the record that a 2% lead is well within most MoEs, and would hardly count as a pickup to the extent that this is being described.</p>
<p>I also note that ArchPundit did not address the 11th (Weller), who has a two-month-old and could, therefore, legitimately withdraw for family reasons.</p>
<p>Hasert (14) is too much to hope.  Shimkus (19) is probably the best bet&#8211;but it will all be moot soon anyway.</p>
<p>Maybe they could run Alan Keyes for the vacancy as a write-in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virginia cynic</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4211</link>
		<dc:creator>virginia cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4211</guid>
		<description>the diary that you are looking for is now in the recent list by madeph. he names the guy and also said that he thought that 24 to 48 hours would be the time. many criticized him for no links but the last time he posted he had the sandra o&#039;coonnor resignation story early and correct. he says that this is another good source but unable to name the source. despite the critics i&#039;m betting on the madeph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the diary that you are looking for is now in the recent list by madeph. he names the guy and also said that he thought that 24 to 48 hours would be the time. many criticized him for no links but the last time he posted he had the sandra o&#8217;coonnor resignation story early and correct. he says that this is another good source but unable to name the source. despite the critics i&#8217;m betting on the madeph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Trabaris</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4210</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Trabaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4210</guid>
		<description>Buck Turgidson:

I just went on KOS and could nothing even obliquely hinting at the purported news on another Republican resignation (although if I were a betting man I&#039;d say it is Shimkus, for other reasons).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buck Turgidson:</p>
<p>I just went on KOS and could nothing even obliquely hinting at the purported news on another Republican resignation (although if I were a betting man I&#8217;d say it is Shimkus, for other reasons).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whetstone</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4209</link>
		<dc:creator>whetstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4209</guid>
		<description>I dunno--all I&#039;ve found so far seems like hearsay (if not totally invented). I&#039;d love to see old-so-and-so out of a job, but it didn&#039;t reek of credibility. Yet. Keeping my eyes peeled, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno&#8211;all I&#8217;ve found so far seems like hearsay (if not totally invented). I&#8217;d love to see old-so-and-so out of a job, but it didn&#8217;t reek of credibility. Yet. Keeping my eyes peeled, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Trabaris</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-4208</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Trabaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2006/10/18/its-breaking-fast/#comment-4208</guid>
		<description>KOS has a poll from Majority Watch for the 10th showing Kirk with 46% and Seals at 44%.   KOS  characterizes the numbers for this poll (and 5 others) as overly optimistic, but great news for Seals.  I had the feeling Kirk was in trouble when he started running negative TV ads mentioning Seals, and mailing out ads touting Kirk&#039;s purported &quot;moderate&quot; views.  (Kirk is such a moderate that he supported the new law legalizing torture and eliminating habeas corpus rights)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KOS has a poll from Majority Watch for the 10th showing Kirk with 46% and Seals at 44%.   KOS  characterizes the numbers for this poll (and 5 others) as overly optimistic, but great news for Seals.  I had the feeling Kirk was in trouble when he started running negative TV ads mentioning Seals, and mailing out ads touting Kirk&#8217;s purported &#8220;moderate&#8221; views.  (Kirk is such a moderate that he supported the new law legalizing torture and eliminating habeas corpus rights)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

