<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Present and Accounted For</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archpundit.com/blog/2004/03/09/present-and-accounted-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2004/03/09/present-and-accounted-for/</link>
	<description>Illinois, From Misery</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ArchPundit</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2004/03/09/present-and-accounted-for/#comment-5635</link>
		<dc:creator>ArchPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 03:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2004/03/09/present-and-accounted-for/#comment-5635</guid>
		<description>===I’m sorry, but these explanations are not persuasive. Eight votes and he could not assert leadership?

Assert leadership?  This makes no sense--and as I pointed out in more recent posts, he killed these bills singlehandedly when he became a committee chair after Democrats took back the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>===I’m sorry, but these explanations are not persuasive. Eight votes and he could not assert leadership?</p>
<p>Assert leadership?  This makes no sense&#8211;and as I pointed out in more recent posts, he killed these bills singlehandedly when he became a committee chair after Democrats took back the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua M</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2004/03/09/present-and-accounted-for/#comment-5636</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2004/03/09/present-and-accounted-for/#comment-5636</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry, but these explanations are not persuasive.  Eight votes and he could not assert leadership?  This is consistent with Obama skipping lots of US Senate votes, too, where he is now the most "not present" voter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but these explanations are not persuasive.  Eight votes and he could not assert leadership?  This is consistent with Obama skipping lots of US Senate votes, too, where he is now the most &#8220;not present&#8221; voter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://archpundit.com/blog/2004/03/09/present-and-accounted-for/#comment-5634</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.63/~archpund/2004/03/09/present-and-accounted-for/#comment-5634</guid>
		<description>As an Obama supporter (had him in law school, hosted a fundraiser for him last week with Studs Terkel), I had my concerns about these votes.  They were basically allayed by the Planned Parenthood endorsement, but it's very nice to see, finally, exactly why these "present" votes are not a cop-out.

That said, with turnout expected low, I wonder if these new poll leads for Obama really mean much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an Obama supporter (had him in law school, hosted a fundraiser for him last week with Studs Terkel), I had my concerns about these votes.  They were basically allayed by the Planned Parenthood endorsement, but it&#8217;s very nice to see, finally, exactly why these &#8220;present&#8221; votes are not a cop-out.</p>
<p>That said, with turnout expected low, I wonder if these new poll leads for Obama really mean much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
